Reference library 210 articles, 16 photographs, 0 sources AboutContact
IIndia Tell Subscribe
Oral history technique

When to Return for a Second Interview

Launch library · evergreen read

Photo: In-Summer-arriving-by-train-back-to-Stockholm-352106992143 by Unknown photographer (Public domain), via Openverse

A first interview, however well conducted at the time, rarely captures everything a speaker actually has to offer in one single sitting. Fatigue, unfamiliarity with the process, or simply not yet trusting the interviewer can all limit what emerges on that first occasion. A second interview, conducted after both parties have had time to reflect properly, often reaches material the first one missed.

The speaker has had time to remember additional detail they had not initially considered worth mentioning during the earlier conversation. The interviewer, in turn, has had time to identify which threads from the first conversation deserve a deeper follow up later. Building in the expectation of a second or even third session from the very outset changes the whole dynamic considerably.

Rather than treating a single interview as final, the process becomes more of an ongoing conversation held over time. This tends to produce a far more complete and considered account than trying to capture everything in one rushed sitting. Most speakers, given the choice, actually prefer this slower, more generous approach once they understand what it offers.

Back to the library

Share

Sharing opens the network in a new tab. No tracking scripts are loaded on this page.

Printed from India Tell. Sources for this article are listed at the end of the page.